An Outdoor Education

Code of Ethics

Outdoor Education Australia recognises that the professionals working in this field are entrusted with a significant responsibility to nurture the wellbeing of the students and other participants in their care.

The following Code of Ethics articulates the guidelines which the state and territory associations that make up Outdoor Education Australia encourage their members to adhere to.

Background to the Code of Ethics

As part of his Masters of Outdoor Education undertaken at Griffith University, Innes Larkin was encouraged by former Australian Outdoor Education Council President, Jackie Kiewa, to facilitate the development of a Code of Ethics for the Outdoor Education profession.

After a period of research Innes presented his proposal to a gathering of south-east Queensland Outdoor Education professionals at Gregory Terrace Outdoor Education Centre. Through a qualitative approach this group arrived at a basic outline of the core values/ethics that were important to them. From there Innes took their outline and worked it into a cohesive document for presentation at a Queensland Outdoor Education Conference. At this conference the Code of Ethics was further refined.

Following further consultation within Queensland, Innes was encouraged to bring the Code of Ethics to the National Conference in South Australia (2003) where another workshop further refined the document. At then end of the conference a final draft was presented to each state Outdoor Education body to take to their constituents and approve or provide recommendations. Positive responses were received from Queensland, South Australia and Victoria.

Feedback on the Code is welcome.

Ethical Guidelines:


The Outdoor Educator will fulfil his/her duty of care

An Outdoor Educator has a duty of care for the participants under his/her charge.  This duty of care revolves around the principle Lord Denning stated in Donaghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 580, “ You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour… (that is) persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation”.  When applied to the education field, the High Court in Geyer v Downs [1977] (138 CLR 91) moved away from this definition to a more school orientated definition, “ It is now a proper working assumption that the standard of care is that of the reasonable teacher, having regard to the formal and acquired expertise of teachers, and the reasonable school authority, having regards to its resources.”

In fulfilling his/her duty of care, the Outdoor Educator will: 

back to top

 
The Outdoor Educator will provide a supportive and appropriate learning environment

An Outdoor Educator is committed to providing learning experiences for his or her participants. A learning environment must be planned with clear learning goals in mind.  The programme then needs to be developed and implemented with the participants’ physical, social, mental and emotional maturity in mind to safely achieve these learning goals. Flexibility within the learning environment allows for responsiveness to the situation, or participants.

In providing a supportive and appropriate learning environment, the Outdoor Educator will:

back to top


The Outdoor Educator will develop his/her professionalism.

An Outdoor Educator is committed to providing a high standard of professional service and contributing to the profession.

In developing his/her professionalism, the Outdoor Educator will:

back to top


The Outdoor Educator will ensure his or her practice is culturally and environmentally sensitive.

An Outdoor Educator is committed to caring for the earth and its inhabitants.

In practising cultural and environmental sensitivity the Outdoor Educator will:

back to top

Bibliography